Unified system for bimanual interactions on flexible representations of content

ABSTRACT

The unified system for bimanual interactions provides a lightweight and integrated interface that allows the user to efficiently interact with and manipulate content in the user interface. The system is configured to detect a multi-finger interaction on the touchscreen and to differentiate whether the user intends to pan, zoom or frame a portion of the user interface. Generally, the framing interaction is identified by detection of the user&#39;s thumb and forefinger on the touchscreen, which cooperate to define a focus area between vectors extending outwards from the user&#39;s thumb and forefinger. Upon a determination that the user intends to interact with or manipulate content within the focus area, the unified system for bimanual interactions provides an indication of the objects that are located within the focus area and contextual menus for interacting with the objects.

BACKGROUND

Users interact with touchscreens via a variety of interaction techniques. Whether performing a single tap, a ballistic tap, multi-finger gesture, or using a pen, users are able to hold the computing device in their hands or on a supporting surface. Accordingly, interacting with any position on the touchscreen is readily achievable.

However, as touchscreens and electronic whiteboards have continued to get larger, the customary techniques for interacting with small touchscreens, such as are provided on a watch, mobile phone, tablet, laptop or other personal computing device, have become unsatisfactory and impracticable. Further, the existing interaction techniques for providing ink on large displays often require specific devices, result in difficulty with performing large scale touch gestures, or tie up screen real estate with designated interaction areas. Likewise, providing interaction in-place on large displays, close to the locus of interaction, may also provide follow-on benefits in terms of efficiency, maintaining the flow of visual attention, and chunking multiple operations together into unified action-sequences—even on smaller screens, such as those of tablets, laptops, and interactive drafting tables.

SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description section. This summary is not intended to identify all key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.

Aspects of systems and methods for implementing a unified system for bimanual interactions are discussed herein. The unified system for bimanual interactions provides a lightweight and integrated interface that allows the user to efficiently interact with and manipulate content in the user interface. The system is configured to detect an interaction on the touchscreen and to differentiate whether the user intends to pan, zoom or frame a portion of the user interface. According to one aspect, the framing interaction is identified by detection of the thumb and forefinger (and/or additional fingers) of the user's non-preferred hand on the touchscreen, which cooperate to define a focus area between vectors extending outwards from the user's thumb and forefinger. According to another aspect, the framing interaction is identified by detection of a finger of the non-preferred hand on the touchscreen, which defines a focus area extending outwards from the finger (resizable based on the pressure of the finger) and oriented based on the hand, wrist, or other contextual information regarding the user's hand. When the framing interaction is associated with multi-finger interactions, the unified system is operable to provide visual feedback of a potential selection while the system remains in a “speculating state,” which provides the ability for the user to select or zoom simultaneously. Upon a determination that the user intends to make a selection, the unified system for bimanual interactions provides an indication of the objects that are located within the focus area and contextual menus for interacting with the objects. The use of these contextual menus support flexible, interpretation-rich representations of content that are organized in levels along four conceptual axes of movement, including a structural axis, a semantic axis, a temporal axis, and a social axis. Each of these axes may offer multiple gradations of representation. Based on which end of the contextual axis is selected, the user can progressively add formality and structure to a representation by moving up a level, or revert to a less-structured representation by moving down a level in the opposite direction. Moreover, as the formality and structure to a representation changes, the representation may be recognized, re-structured, or reinterpreted.

Examples are implemented as a computer process, a computing system, or as an article of manufacture such as a device, computer program product, or computer readable medium. According to an aspect, the computer program product is a computer storage medium readable by a computer system and encoding a computer program comprising instructions for executing a computer process.

The details of one or more aspects are set forth in the accompanying drawings and description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that the following detailed description is explanatory only and is not restrictive of the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this disclosure, illustrate various aspects. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example computing environment implementing a unified system for bimanual interactions;

FIG. 2 is an illustration of an example environment illustrating implementation of a unified system for bimanual interactions;

FIGS. 3A-3B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIG. 4 is an illustration of an example graphical user interface in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an example state-transition model for a unified system for bimanual interactions;

FIGS. 6A-6B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example graphical user interface in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIGS. 8A-8C are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIGS. 9A-9D are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIGS. 10A-10B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIGS. 11A-11F are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIGS. 12A-12B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces in which a unified system for bimanual interactions is implemented;

FIG. 13 is a flow chart showing general stages involved in an example method for a unified system for bimanual interactions;

FIG. 14 is a flow chart showing general stages involved in an example method for a unified system for bimanual interactions;

FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating example physical components of a computing device;

FIGS. 16A and 16B are block diagrams of a mobile computing device; and

FIG. 17 is a block diagram of a distributed computing system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the following description refers to the same or similar elements. While examples may be described, modifications, adaptations, and other implementations are possible. For example, substitutions, additions, or modifications may be made to the elements illustrated in the drawings, and the methods described herein may be modified by substituting, reordering, or adding stages to the disclosed methods. Accordingly, the following detailed description is not limiting, but instead, the proper scope is defined by the appended claims. Examples may take the form of a hardware implementation, or an entirely software implementation, or an implementation combining software and hardware aspects. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example computing environment 100 implementing a unified system for bimanual interactions 130.

As illustrated, the example computing environment 100 includes a touchscreen display 110 in communication with a computing device 120. The touchscreen display including, without limitation, whiteboards, tablets, mobile devices, or other touch or gesture devices configured for bimanual interactions. Further, the computing device 120 is in communication with a unified system for bimanual interactions 130.

The unified system for bimanual interactions 130 provides a lightweight and integrated interface that allows the user to efficiently interact with and manipulate content in the user interface. The system is configured to detect a multi-finger interaction on the touchscreen and to differentiate whether the user intends to pan, zoom or frame a portion of the user interface. Generally, the framing interaction is identified by detection of the user's thumb and forefinger on the touchscreen, which cooperate to define a focus area between vectors extending outwards from the user's thumb and forefinger. Simultaneous with interpreting multiple such touches as pan/zoom operations, the system allows concurrent interaction or manipulation of content framed within the focus area. The unified system for bimanual interactions 130 speculatively fades-in an indication of the objects that are located within the focus area, as well as contextual menus for interacting with the objects. This fade-in does not interfere with pan-zoom manipulations, nor do ongoing pan-zoom gestures preclude interaction with, or manipulation of, the framed content. Both interpretations of multi-finger gestures are fed forward by the system, in parallel, such that zooming can smoothly transition to selection, and acting on the selection, without initiating a new gesture.

The computing device 120 is illustrative of a variety of computing systems including, without limitation, desktop computer systems, large display device, wired and wireless computing systems, mobile computing systems (e.g., mobile telephones, netbooks, tablet or slate type computers, notebook computers, and laptop computers), hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, and mainframe computers. The hardware of these computing systems is discussed in greater detail in regard to FIGS. 15, 16A, 16B, and 17. In various aspects, the computing device 120 is accessible locally and/or by a network, which may include the Internet, a Local Area Network (LAN), a private distributed network for an entity (e.g., a company, a university, a government agency), a wireless ad hoc network, a Virtual Private Network (VPN) or other direct data link (e.g., Bluetooth connection, a direct wired link).

FIG. 2 is an illustration of example environment 200 illustrating implementation of a unified system for bimanual interactions 130. In the illustrated example, the user is presenting content on an electronic whiteboard 210. However, it should also be recognized that the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 may be utilized with tablets, mobile devices, or other computing devices having a touchscreen display. In another example, the unified system may be utilized with non-touch displays, head-mounted displays, or remotely located displays by receipt of bimanual interactions 130 via a touchpad and a mouse, e.g., a user's use of the touchpad by a non-preferred hand and use of a mouse by a preferred hand.

The unified system for bimanual interactions 130 provides a lightweight and integrated interface for users to work on a particular portion of a user interface. The unified system for bimanual interactions 130 enables the user to focus attention on ‘the workspace,’ i.e. the portion of the screen devoted to working with content (as opposed to toolbars, icons, panels, or other persistent user interface elements typically arranged around the edges of a display, or application window). As illustrated in FIG. 2, the user is able to frame a portion of the user interface using the non-preferred hand to define a focus area 220. Further, the user is able to use their preferred hand to interacting with and/or manipulating the content. In other examples, the user may interact with the user interface by utilizing a pen in their preferred hand. Using the non-preferred hand to indicate the desired content, and the preferred hand to act upon it, is particularly desirable because this corresponds with how people have been observed to naturally use their hands for everyday tasks.

FIGS. 3A-3B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces 300 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. As discussed above, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 enables the user to focus attention on some specific desired subset of content within the workspace of a user interface, for selectively acting upon the desired content consisting of one or more objects, while excluding other parts of the screen from the operation.

According to one aspect, the user frames a portion of the workspace, thereby defining a focus area 220 on the user interface. In one example, the user frames the desired handwriting (typically consisting of a plurality of small ink-stroke objects) using a framing interaction on the user interface. Specifically, in FIG. 3A-3B, the framing interaction is illustrated as a multi-finger interaction including the thumb and forefinger of the user's non-preferred hand. Generally, the focus area 220 is defined by the area located between vectors extending outwards from the user's thumb and forefinger. In some aspects, additional fingers (or portions of the palm, or side of the hand) of the same hand may rest on the display as well, or alternative fingers can be used, such that the thumb and forefinger do not necessarily have to be used to ‘frame’ the desired area. In one example, the visualization of a semi-transparent palette is configured to provide a perception as a natural extension of the hand. For example, the semi-transparent palette mimics the cleft between thumb and forefinger, thereby fitting into the hand, so that it feels like a projection of one's reach. Further, in another example, the rounded area at the apex of the palette can be used as a place where the user can tuck away objects and carry them in a temporary clipboard.

Further, the focus area 220 extends outward from the user's thumb and forefinger by a selected distance. In some aspects, this extent is proportional to the size of the screen. In other aspects, the geometry of additional fingers from the same hand influences the extent. In yet other aspects, the focus area 220 extends a distance based on the user preferences. In further aspects, implicitly recognized (e.g. through ink analysis and recognition) or manually specified groupings of objects may also be taken into account when the system decides how far to extend the focus area 220. The palette is preferentially rendered with a semi-transparent gradient that trails off with the distance from the apex, which illuminates the selection area with a soft-edged feel. The unified system for bimanual interactions 130 provides an indication of the content that is located within the focus area 220. Content outside of the focus area 220 remains unselected by the user. In one example, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 highlights objects in the selection with a bright-red outer glow. In another example, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 also highlights objects with a dashed-line roundtangle (i.e., a quadrilateral with rounded corners) around all the selected objects with menus providing functionality for interacting with the objects.

While the illustrated framing interaction is similar to the pinch-to-zoom gesture, the framing interaction and the pinch-to-zoom gesture can co-exist because of the intuitive visual feedback associated with the unified system for bimanual interactions 130. At any subtle hesitation while zooming using the pinch-to-zoom gesture, selection feedback starts to fade-in on the user interface. As users encounter and notice the selection feedback, the users are able to intuitively recognize that the framing interaction allows the user to select the relevant portion of the user interface without further explanation. Thus, the users are able to take advantage of the framing interaction or continue to zoom.

According to one aspect, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 implements functionality to further distinguish the framing interaction from the pinch-to-zoom gesture. Specifically, in one example, the framing interaction is triggered based on the motion dynamics, including one or more of spatial and temporal qualities of the gesture/interaction. Touching the user interface and holding the framing interaction for a fixed timeout causes the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 to trigger a selection. In another example, the pinch-to-zoom interpretation of two-finger gestures dominates selection such that panning and zooming responds immediately without providing selection feedback. But if the user hesitates while zooming, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 starts to fade in only the illumination of a semi-transparent palette of tools, which is shown in FIG. 3A. However, if the pinch-to-zoom motion resumes, all selection feedback fades out completely. In one aspect, pinch-to-zoom can smoothly transition to the framing gesture, and bring up selection feedback and the semi-transparent palette, by touching down additional fingers. In another aspect, the selection feedback and semi-transparent palette can be reserved to a specific number of fingers (e.g., five fingers, or three fingers) which transitions back and forth to pan/zoom when only two fingers are present.

When the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 detects that the framing interaction is the desired functionality, the frame “latches in” the palette, as in FIG. 3B. In one example, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 detects that the framing interaction is the desired functionality when the user holds the framing interaction stationary. In another example, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 detects that the framing interaction is the desired functionality when the framing interaction exhibits less than 10 mm of finger movement over a 500 ms time-window. However, this is unlike a traditional dwell time because the user does not have to wait 500 ms to act on the highlighted objects. Since the radial menus start fading in with the object highlighting, the user can accelerate the fade-in transition by touching down on a menu immediately, or by grabbing the objects, such as to drag them to a new position. In some aspects, the instant two fingers touch down on the canvas, the (still-invisible) focus area 220 is active, and can be manipulated or gestured immediately by the user.

According to another aspect, the framing interaction operates as a mode switch and input filter. More specifically, the framing gesture itself also serves as a non-preferred hand mode switch that allows the user to gesture-through the semi-transparent palette. Accordingly, pen strokes or finger drag gestures articulated by the preferred hand within the palette are interpreted as gestures, which can be recognized and interpreted with respect to the selected objects, rather than just creating an ink stroke. For example, via touch the user is able to drag the selected objects to a new position on the user interface or manipulate a selected object. The pen can crop, cut, or otherwise modify the contents as a special-purpose tool. Thus, the framed area doubles as an input filter that modifies the interpretation of pen or touch gestures in this area, and pen gestures may take on a different (complementary) interpretation to pen or touch gestures if desired.

Further, FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate an example of how the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 enables the interaction and manipulation of ink. More specifically, the menu options enable the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 to provide various context-dependent functionalities in the radial menus to interact and manipulate the objects within the focus area 220. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, the selected objects include ink stating “Go team!” For example, a semantic axis within a radial context menu may include functionality to recognize the text itself, while preserving the position, point size, and orientation of handwritten strokes such as depicted in FIG. 3B. Moreover, the user can revert to the original ink strokes—that is, un-recognize them, by reversing the direction of movement along the menu's semantic axis of representation—to make corrections or add to the handwritten strokes. In other aspects, the functionality may otherwise be arranged in opposing sides of an axis.

FIG. 4 is an illustration of example graphical user interface 400 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. According to one aspect, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 provides flexibility to posture and adjustment the framing interaction.

As discussed above, when the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 detects that the framing interaction is the desired functionality the framing “latches in” the palette. Once the framing interaction latches in the pan/zoom interpretation is unavailable, but the user is able to move, reorient, and adjust the angle subtended by the framing without disturbing the canvas. Thus, in order to return to pan/zoom, the user must lift the non-preferred hand, which dismisses the framing. This approach allows zooming to be freely combined with selection highlighting until the framing interaction latches in. The user can zoom in close to select a single ink stroke—or zoom out to select a large area (even the entire workspace, or multiple workspaces), or distant objects that would normally be out-of-reach. However, the framing interaction is adjustable based on the user re-orienting a thumb and forefinger, which allows the user to steer, re-orient, and otherwise manipulate the framed area. Furthermore, the angle of the framing interaction is adjustable based on a function of the angle subtended by user's thumb and forefinger, which allows the framed area to be focused into a narrow beam or expanded to include a wider selection.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an example state-transition model 500 for a unified system for bimanual interactions 130. The interaction starts in the neutral state, with zero or one finger on the display. In response to detection of two touches from the non-preferred hand (typically, but not necessarily, the thumb and forefinger), the neutral state transitions to a speculating state where both pinch-to-zoom and selection are active. Further, in the speculating state, the selection feedback starts to fade in proportionally to the system's confidence, e.g., the degree of movement vs. hesitation, which can be computed as an exponentially-weighted function of recent motion samples from the finger(s) or through use of machine learning to determine the system's confidence. Once the user holds the framing interaction stable for a predetermined period of time or interacts with the framed area or radial menus, the speculating state transitions to the framing state (i.e., the framing interaction is latched in). Further, according to aspects, the speculating and framing states allow more than two fingers to rest on the canvas if desired, which allows the user to comfortably rest the whole hand on the user interface. Furthermore, note that in one aspect, the framing gesture is preferentially bound to touches from the non-preferred hand, either through convention and design assumptions built into the software, or through a direct sensing mechanism (such as sensing motion-signals from a wearable device on the wrist, skeletal tracking provided by a depth-camera associated with the display, and so forth). In other aspects—whether the specific hands can be sensed and distinguished—the “first hand” to touch down triggers framing, and the “second hand” triggers manipulation or action. Heuristics may be used to resolve which way to orient the framing region (given that there is a 180-degree ambiguity of which way it should face), such as the geometry of the touches, the time dynamics of the touches, and location of the touches on the display. In some aspects, “tapping behind” the framing area with a third finger, or the opposite hand, flips the direction of the framing region by 180 degrees. Furthermore, in some aspects, the user may “pin down” the semi-transparent palette (e.g. through tapping on a thumbtack icon adjacent to the palette, or exerting additional pressure on a pressure-sensing screen) to allow the palette to persist after lifting the hand(s), which is particularly advantageous for usage contexts that may require one-handed interaction.

FIGS. 6A-6B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces 600 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. As discussed above, the focus area 220 extends outward from the user's thumb and forefinger by a selected distance. In one example, the default distance is selected at one-fifth of the user interface, as shown in FIG. 6A. However, if it is necessary to adjust the framed area, the user can simply swipe the framed area with the preferred hand to directly adjust its extent. For example, the user may touch and drag the semi-transparent palette to the desired distance, as shown in FIG. 6B. In some aspects, the motion dynamics of the non-preferred hand also influence the size of the selection region; for example, a rapidly-stabilized framing gesture or rapid sliding of the frame across the display stretches the extent of the framing region, while a deliberate or carefully articulated movement preferentially treats the gesture as indicating a smaller, more precisely circumscribed area. Automatic clustering of ink-strokes (or other objects) nearby may also influence the chosen extent. In yet other aspects, the pressure of the touch could affect the size of the selection region. For example, a light touch might select a small region whereas a strong touch might select a larger region.

FIG. 7 is an illustration of an example graphical user interface 700 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. According to aspects, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 provides various menus that enable the interaction and manipulation of objects within the framed area. In some aspects, these menus may be preferentially located proximal to a particular finger, such as the index finger or thumb, to make them faster and easier to select through the kinesthetic sense (i.e. with a minimum of visual attention to an arbitrarily placed icon). In other aspects, a “menu” corresponds to the entire palette itself, such that a pen or finger gesture anywhere on the palette is interpreted as a stroke within the menu and a pen or finger gesture on an object is interpreted to perform an action based on the object. This effectively gives the menu a large target area, and can advantageously blur the line between “directional gestures” and “menu selections.” Note that finger-proximal and on-palette menus of this sort can both be provided at the same time, and may correspond to two or more distinct menus if desired.

According to one aspect, the menus provide commands for interacting with and manipulating the selected objects. As illustrated in FIG. 7, in one aspect the menus are located adjacent to the framed area and include context-appropriate functions. More specifically, the menus include an actions menu and a representations menu. However, other (multiple) menus may be provided, including but not limited to the various locations, areas, and zones anticipated herein, to enable interaction with and manipulation of objects indicated within the framed area. In some implementations, one or more of the menus are otherwise arranged (e.g., linearly), which are not arranged in a radial menu.

As illustrated in the expanded view of the actions menu, the action menu includes four commands: duplicate (down in FIG. 7), share (up), search (right), and “the fold.” (left).

The duplicate command allows a quick downward swipe on the menu to copy the selection. The user can optionally continue dragging to transition directly to direct manipulation, which allows the user to create and place the duplicate in a single uninterrupted movement.

The search command enables gathering content from the web. According to one aspect, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 supports an image search function. In one example, the user may select handwritten ink and swipe right on the Actions Menu to recognize the text and initiate the search. In response to the search request, the top search results are inserted on the canvas as new reference images.

The share command enables the selected content to be shared with a collaborator. According to one aspect, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 supports moving between social levels in terms of co-located collaborators working on the electronic whiteboard and a tablet. In one example, the user may select handwritten ink and swipe up on the Actions Menu through the share command, which takes all of the objects contained in the framed area and sends them to the collaborator as a new group object that slides onto the collaborator's user interface. The collaborator may choose to accept the object or dismiss the share.

“The fold” is a designated area at the apex of the frame interaction semi-transparent palette where the user can tuck away objects for later use. Generally, “the fold” serves as a lightweight clipboard that can contain multiple objects at a location easily accessible from the framed area. Selection of “the fold” command in the action menu animates the selection into the curved apex. When the user later makes the framing gesture again, any items in the fold are visible and can be dragged out one-by-one. Further, by zooming out, the entire canvas or multiple canvases can be selected and pulled into “the fold,” thus providing a convenient mechanism for transporting objects. In some aspects, the user can bypass the menu command and place objects directly into “the fold” whenever desired simply by dragging them in via direct-manipulation.

As illustrated in the expanded view of the representations menu, the representations menu includes three axes of movement, namely a semantic axis, a structural axis, and a temporal axis. The semantic axis allows users to raise or lower the level of “meaning” that the system ascribes to the selected objects. In one example, the default semantic is that of the ink stroke. However, the semantics can be elevated to recognize text, or to identify a list structure. Furthermore, the semantics can be lowered to revert back to the individual points of the stroke. The structural axis plays a similar role regarding the spatial arrangement of the objects, which can be freeform (i.e., no structure), grouped, or arranged (i.e., a grid). Additionally, objects within objects in a structure may be reverted to their original arrangement if the user lowers the structural level. The temporal axis provides access to the time-ordering of the objects, which allows scrubbing back and forth in time to revert a portion of the workspace to a previous state of completion. In effect, this a local undo operation that affects only the specified subset of objects in the workspace.

Further, it should be recognized that the share and search commands together comprise a social axis within the unified system for bimanual interactions 130. Accordingly, the social axis may alternatively be provided via the representations menu. Generally, these four axes are organized into levels. The social axis facilitates the social engagement of gathering ideas and inspiration from the web or sharing content with another collaborator. Each of these axes may offer multiple gradations of representation: for example, search may expand from personal, to the local store, to a shared team repository, and finally to the web. Furthermore, the user may gradually instill or remove representations from content on the canvas. For example, the user can progressively add formality and structure to a representation by moving up a level, or revert to a less-structured representation by moving down a level. The changes to the representational level create new types of objects, which are inserted on the canvas in place of the higher-level or lower-level objects.

FIGS. 8A-8C are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces 800 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. More specifically, the depictions illustrate the execution of the semantic functionalities on grids and tables. For example, in FIG. 8A, the user has selected a grid in the framed area, which has been recognized as a grid from previously received ink strokes. If the user desires to manipulate the grid, the user may stroke drown the formatted table to add new rows or stroke across the formatted table to add new columns. However, when the user wants to perform more complex manipulations, the user is able to stroke down on the semantic axis to revert the grid to a less-structured representation by moving down a level. As a result, the grid is transformed into a hand-drawn table that allows the user to manipulate the underlying ink strokes. For example, in FIG. 8B, the user is merging the top cells by removing portions of the original ink strokes. After the user has edited the strokes, the user strokes up on the semantic axis to revert the hand-drawn table to a more-structured representation by moving up a level to recognize additional details, such as shown in FIG. 8C. In one instance, handwritten text in a structured represented grid is automatically recognized and converted to text (i.e., ‘Annual Report’ in FIG. 8C).

FIGS. 9A-9D are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces 900 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. According to one aspect, the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 provides for image manipulation based on the semantic level. For example, FIG. 9A depicts that the user has selected an image in the framed area. By dropping the selected image down a semantic level to the pixel representation, the user is able to manipulate the image, which enables pen or touch inputs to be treated as image operations. This allows the user to: perform image operations such as blending, blurring, or wiping away (FIG. 9B), select portions of the image (FIG. 9C), or perform cropping and cut-out operations (FIG. 9D) on the selected image.

FIGS. 10A-10B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces 1000 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. More specifically, the depictions illustrate the execution of the structural functionalities on content. For example, in FIG. 10A, the user has selected a cluttered grouping of objects in the framed area. If the user desires to manipulate the structure of the grouping, the user may stroke up on the structural axis to arrange the grouping in a more-structured representation by moving up a level. As shown in FIG. 10B, one further level up from the group representation rearranges the objects in a fixed grid. Once arranged in the grid, the user is able to drag the objects between grid positions to spatially re-organize them. However, dropping back down to the freeform level reverts the objects to their original (unstructured) spatial arrangement. According to one aspect, the system is configured to store previous spatial arrangements, such that a previous spatial arrangement may be retrieved when the user stokes up or strokes down.

FIGS. 11A-11F are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces 1100 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. According to one aspect, the depictions illustrate the execution of the multiple functionalities on objects within the framed area. As illustrated in FIGS. 11A-11F, the user is able to execute semantic and structural functionalities on content. FIG. 11A depicts that the user has selected a hand-written list in the framed area. If the user desires to recognize the ink objects depicting the list, the user may stroke up on the semantic axis to provide a more-structured representation by moving up a level. As shown in FIG. 11B, the bulleted list is provided with text while preserving the position, point size, and list format of handwritten strokes. Thereafter, the user may drag individual list items around to re-order the individual items. Further, the user may mark one or more of the list items as being completed. In response to moving up a level, the list is modified to include reflect check marks that the items have been completed (FIG. 11C). Further, the user is able to check off items via a pen or finger stroke. FIG. 11D depicts that the user has selected a hand-written list in the framed area, including circles around the hand-written ink. In response to the user stroking up on the semantic axis, a more-structured representation of the objects is provided (FIG. 11E). Additionally, the user may stroke up on the structural axis to rearrange the objects in a fixed grid such as illustrated in FIG. 11F.

FIGS. 12A-12B are illustrations of example graphical user interfaces 1200 in which a unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is implemented. According to one aspect, the depictions illustrate the execution of the temporal functionalities on objects within the framed area. For example, FIG. 12A depicts that the user has selected objects in the framed area. By dropping the selected objects back a temporal level, the objects are rolled back to a previous version (FIG. 12B) in the temporal timeline. Further, if the user desires to continue rolling back to previous versions, the user is able to articulate the desire through a continuous sliding motion to the desired version. When the timeline is very long, the user may scroll through the timeline by multiple shorter sliding motions, where the user raises a finger and re-centers the finger to continue sliding.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart showing general stages involved in an example method 1300 for implementing a unified system for bimanual interactions 130. Method 1300 begins at OPERATION 1310, where a first and a second manual input are received in an application canvas. In various aspects, the application canvas includes the authoring area of a productivity application, a display area of a gaming application, or a desktop environment of an operating system displayed on a touch capable device. Control areas (such as a menu or a ribbon) of the applications displayed on the touch capable device may be excluded or included from the application canvas in various aspects. In most aspects, each of the manual inputs are received by the touch capable device at OPERATION 1310 concurrently, although the first manual input may be received at an initial time and the second manual input at a later time. Additionally, accessibility options may allow for the first manual input to be persisted after a touch input device (e.g., stylus, finger) has been removed from contact with the touch capable device to allow concurrent input of a second manual input despite only one input device being used. Although examples are given herein primarily in terms of “hands” and “fingers”, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that method 1300 is operable to implement bimanual interactions via a plurality of other input devices, including multi-touch touchpads or touch digitizers that lack integrated displays.

Proceeding to DECISION 1320, it is determined whether the first and second manual inputs are provided by one “hand” as part of a bimanual focus area defining input. When it is determined that the two manual inputs are not part of a bimanual focus area defining input, method 1300 may end or repeat analysis of the two inputs to determine if they later define a bimanual focus area defining input. When it is determined that the two manual inputs are part of a bimanual focus area defining input, method 1300 proceeds to OPERATION 1330. To determine whether the first and second manual inputs are provided by one “hand”, the touch capable device may examine a distance between the manual inputs (e.g., are the inputs within a hand span distance threshold), detect additional hand components (e.g., more fingers, fingerprints, knuckles, a palm) in contact or proximity with a touch surface, receive a signal from a pointing device requesting a focus area 220, or a proximity or inertial-motion signal from a smart watch or other device indicating the presence of a user's hand.

In various aspects of DECISION 1320, a determination may be made to ignore an input that would otherwise define one “hand” as part of a bimanual focus area defining input when it is determined that a dominant hand is being used. In some aspects, since a user may be more likely to use a dominant hand for multi-touch gestures (e.g., direct manipulation of the size and orientation of an object) than for defining a focus area 220, the two manual inputs may be treated as a non-focus area defining multi-touch input when it is determined that a dominant hand is being used. Whether a given hand is dominant or non-dominant may be defined by a user (e.g., a right/left handed preference setting), user preferences stored in a wearable device, based on the presence of a smart watch (which wrist it is worn on indicating a non-dominant hand) or other inferences based on the geometry and dynamics of the touch, or may be assumed to be a given hand. The two manual inputs may be related to a hand based on a presence of a third input (leftward or rightward of the two manual inputs, indicating the opposite hand is making the two manual inputs), a shape of the contact point indicating finger/hand orientation, the presence of other hand components, where the touch-points are on the screen (near an edge, towards one side or the other, etc.), or where the user is sensed to be standing relative to the display (e.g. by a depth camera such as the KINECT® offered by Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash.).

At OPERATION 1330 a focus area 220 is defined. Two vectors, one associated with each manual input, are extended away from the hand for a given distance. In various aspects, the given distance is one fifth of the displayed application canvas (up to an edge of the application canvas), but may be adjusted by the user via various setting and later revisions. In some aspects, each vector may be extended for different distance from the hand. The two vectors intersect in an area associated with the palm of the hand and extend outward along the fingers that provide the two manual inputs, passing through the input points and extending therefrom. In various aspects, the location of the intersection point is determined by a third contact that is part of the hand (e.g., a palm resting on the touch capable device) or at a predefined distance and angle from the two manual inputs. An arc extends between the two vectors (at the given distance) to define an area for the focus area 220. In various aspects, the arc may have various curvatures, including no curvature (defining a triangular focus area 220), that may be set and adjusted by the user. In other examples, the focus area 220 is otherwise arranged in varying sizes and shapes. In some aspects, the focus area 220 may preferentially extend all the way to the edge of the screen, or to the edge of the interaction area containing the objects (such as that defined by an application window, a column of text, or a sub-pane of a user interface workspace).

The focus area 220 is displayed in the application canvas at OPERATION 1340. In various aspects, the focus area 220 may be displayed with different colors and transparencies as an overlay (or underlay) of the objects within the application canvas. The vectors and/or arc may be displayed in additional aspects, as may various focus area controls. Optionally, at OPERATION 1350, the objects within the focus area 220 are visually highlighted to distinguish them from objects outside of the focus area 220. Highlighting includes, but is not limited to: providing an edge color, a transparent overlay, an overlay color, shadow effect, shine/sparkle effect, animation effect (e.g., a bounce or twitch), an XOR type of effect that contrasts with underlying content, etc.

Proceeding to DECISION 1360, it is determined whether an additional touch input has been received. In various aspects, the touch input may be from the same hand as the two manual inputs, a different hand, or from a pointing device. In various aspects, the additional touch input is a single- or multi-finger input or a gesture, which may be interpreted differently (to perform various actions) based on the application providing the application canvas, user preferences, a location at which it is received, and the objects identified in the focus area 220. The modality of the input (such as touch vs. pen, or their use in combination) may also distinguish the interpretation of the resulting gesture. In some aspects, natural language (voice) input may also be interpreted in the context of the currently indicated region, e.g., “send this to Bill,” “enhance contrast,” or “find more [images] like this.”

In response to determining that no additional touch input has been received, method 1300 returns to OPERATION 1310. As users may squeeze or widen their fingers to change their positions relative to one other, the focus area 220 may be redefined based on new manual inputs and adjustments to the vectors. In some aspects, this is not a direct 1:1 mapping between finger separation and angle, allowing for gain factors, snapping behaviors, and non-linear transfer functions familiar to those skilled in the art. Similarly, user may rotate their hands, but keep the relative positions of their fingers the same, thus providing new manual inputs to define an angle at which the focus area 220 is “projected” for display on the application canvas from the hand. The relative positions of the fingers may be determined based on the identification of the orientation of fingerprints. In addition, depth sensing (cameras) may sense a wearable device, the user's wrist, the articulation of the forearm, and overall relative body orientation, to help refine the projection of the framing-region from the fingertips.

In response to determining that a touch input has been received, but that it was received in open space (rather than in association with an object or control), that touch input may be treated as a focus area defining gesture, and method 1300 returns to OPERATION 1330 to adjust how the focus area 220 is defined. In some aspects, this is interpreted as a direct-manipulation of the edges and outer arc defining the focus area 220. In other aspects, for example, a user may make a swipe gesture to change a shape or curvature of the arc, the given distance at which the arc is defined from the manual inputs, or a vector behavior. In another aspect, that touch input may be treated as a global gesture to affect all the objects within the focus area 220. For example, a user inputting a “pinch/expand” gesture may enlarge or shrink the size of all objects within the focus area 220. Other space behaviors are possible, and those above are given as non-limiting examples. Note that gestures that are within, proximal to, or in various zones adjacent to the focus area 220 may be given different interpretations.

In response to determining that a touch input has been received, and that it was received in association with an object(s) or control, method 1300 proceeds to OPERATION 1370, where that object or control is selected. Selecting an object(s) results in object-related controls being displayed in the focus area 220, and selecting a control results in an interaction being performed on one or more objects. Both of these behaviors are discussed in greater detail in regard to FIG. 14. Method 1300 may then end, or continue displaying the focus area 220. Note that the controls offered may depend on the type of objects in the selection (including selections of mixed object types, or ‘empty’ selections that indicate an area but otherwise contain no objects). Universal operations common to all object types can also be hosted within the same framework (such as those provided on the aforementioned ‘actions’ menu).

FIG. 14 is a flow chart showing general stages involved in an example method 1400 for handling object interaction in a unified system for bimanual interactions 130. Method 1400 begins at OPERATION 1410, where a selection of an object displayed within a focus area 220 of an application canvas is received. The focus area 220, and how it is defined and adjusted, is discussed in greater detail in regard to FIG. 13. In various aspects, the selection is received via a touch input selecting one or more objects, while in other aspects, objects are automatically selected in response to defining the focus area 220 and determining that the objects lie within. In particular, ink analysis and recognition may optionally be used in combination with the indicated spatial extent to select appropriate aggregations of objects.

At OPERATION 1420, controls for interacting with the object are displayed in the focus area 220. In various aspects, controls are displayed in proximity to the object selected or in predefined portions of the focus area 220. A selection of a given control is received at OPERATION 1430, and the effect of the control and how the object(s) is to be interacted with is applied at OPERATION 1440. Method 1400 may conclude after OPERATION 1440, return to an earlier OPERATION 1410, 1420, 1430 in response to a new object or control selection or the interaction type of a selected control.

The controls may include parent controls that, when actuated, expand into a set of sub-controls for various interactions or activities. The sub-controls may be arranged along axes extending from the parent control, and sub-controls may be organized onto various axes based on having similar functionalities. The frequency of use of an individual sub-control may further inform its position on its axis relative to the parent control (e.g., more frequently used sub-controls are disposed of closer to the parent control). The controls displayed in association with a given object may be based on a category of that object, and are configured to affect that object. When multiple objects are selected, the controls displayed in association with those objects may be for the individual objects or the group of objects. Radial menus (also known as marking menus) offer one particularly advantageous way to arrange commands as sets of directional strokes for pen and touch interaction, but other approaches such as traditional buttons, toolbars, or pull-down menus, as well as click-through tools, can also be offered proximal to the parent controls.

The controls displayed at OPERATION 1420 may also include universal controls, that are not associated with a given object or group of objects, yet which may still use the extent of the focus area 220 to scope their effects. For example a “trashcan” control may be displayed along an edge of the focus area 220 to delete any object dragged to that control, or a “paste” control can insert the contents of the system clipboard at the indicated location, optionally with a drag-through gesture to fine-tune their placement. In another example, a fold control is displayed in a region associated with the palm of the “hand” defining the focus area 220, and extending therefrom. A fold control acts as a multiple-object visual clipboard, always at-hand, with which a user may drag objects from the focus area 220 onto, and drag object from the clipboard back into the focus area 220 for insertion therein. In various aspects, the memory space used to store the objects in the fold is associated with the given user defining the focus area 220, and may be a cloud-based or other external storage device (e.g., on a smart watch) that enables the user to interact with the item across a plurality of devices. Objects stored in the fold control may be presented as paste controls (e.g., as icons of the objects) to enable the user to quickly select a stored object and insert it into the application canvas.

While implementations have been described in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with an application program that runs on an operating system on a computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that aspects may also be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.

The aspects and functionalities described herein may operate via a multitude of computing systems including, without limitation, desktop computer systems, wired and wireless computing systems, mobile computing systems (e.g., mobile telephones, netbooks, tablet or slate type computers, notebook computers, and laptop computers), hand-held devices, AR or VR headsets, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, and mainframe computers.

In addition, according to an aspect, the aspects and functionalities described herein operate over distributed systems (e.g., cloud-based computing systems), where application functionality, memory, data storage and retrieval and various processing functions are operated remotely from each other over a distributed computing network, such as the Internet or an intranet. According to an aspect, user interfaces and information of various types are displayed via on-board computing device displays or via remote display units associated with one or more computing devices. For example, user interfaces and information of various types are displayed and interacted with on a wall surface onto which user interfaces and information of various types are projected. Interaction with the multitude of computing systems with which implementations are practiced include, keystroke entry, touch screen entry, voice or other audio entry, gesture entry where an associated computing device is equipped with detection (e.g., camera) functionality for capturing and interpreting user gestures for controlling the functionality of the computing device, and the like.

FIGS. 15-17 and the associated descriptions provide a discussion of a variety of operating environments in which examples are practiced. However, the devices and systems illustrated and discussed with respect to FIGS. 15-17 are for purposes of example and illustration and are not limiting of a vast number of computing device configurations that are utilized for practicing aspects, described herein.

FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating physical components (i.e., hardware) of a computing device 1500 with which examples of the present disclosure may be practiced. In a basic configuration, the computing device 1500 includes at least one processing unit 1502 and a system memory 1504. According to an aspect, depending on the configuration and type of computing device, the system memory 1504 comprises, but is not limited to, volatile storage (e.g., random access memory), non-volatile storage (e.g., read-only memory), flash memory, or any combination of such memories. According to an aspect, the system memory 1504 includes an operating system 1505 and one or more program modules 1506 suitable for running software applications 1550. According to an aspect, the system memory 1504 includes unified system for bimanual interactions 130. The operating system 1505, for example, is suitable for controlling the operation of the computing device 1500. Furthermore, aspects are practiced in conjunction with a graphics library, other operating systems, or any other application program, and are not limited to any particular application or system. This basic configuration is illustrated in FIG. 15 by those components within a dashed line 1508. According to an aspect, the computing device 1500 has additional features or functionality. For example, according to an aspect, the computing device 1500 includes additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in FIG. 15 by a removable storage device 1509 and a non-removable storage device 1510.

As stated above, according to an aspect, a number of program modules and data files are stored in the system memory 1504. While executing on the processing unit 1502, the program modules 1506 (e.g., unified system for bimanual interactions 130) perform processes including, but not limited to, one or more of the stages of the methods 1300 and 1400 illustrated in FIGS. 13 and 14. According to an aspect, other program modules are used in accordance with examples and include applications such as electronic mail and contacts applications, word processing applications, spreadsheet applications, database applications, slide presentation applications, drawing or computer-aided application programs, etc.

According to an aspect, aspects are practiced in an electrical circuit comprising discrete electronic elements, packaged or integrated electronic chips containing logic gates, a circuit utilizing a microprocessor, or on a single chip containing electronic elements or microprocessors. For example, aspects are practiced via a system-on-a-chip (SOC) where each or many of the components illustrated in FIG. 15 are integrated onto a single integrated circuit. According to an aspect, such an SOC device includes one or more processing units, graphics units, communications units, system virtualization units and various application functionality all of which are integrated (or “burned”) onto the chip substrate as a single integrated circuit. When operating via an SOC, the functionality, described herein, is operated via application-specific logic integrated with other components of the computing device 1500 on the single integrated circuit (chip). According to an aspect, aspects of the present disclosure are practiced using other technologies capable of performing logical operations such as, for example, AND, OR, and NOT, including but not limited to mechanical, optical, fluidic, and quantum technologies. In addition, aspects are practiced within a general purpose computer or in any other circuits or systems.

According to an aspect, the computing device 1500 has one or more input device(s) 1512 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a sound input device, a touch input device, etc. The output device(s) 1514 such as a display, speakers, a printer, etc. are also included according to an aspect. The aforementioned devices are examples and others may be used. According to an aspect, the computing device 1500 includes one or more communication connections 1516 allowing communications with other computing devices 1518. Examples of suitable communication connections 1516 include, but are not limited to, radio frequency (RF) transmitter, receiver, and/or transceiver circuitry; universal serial bus (USB), parallel, and/or serial ports.

The term computer readable media, as used herein, includes computer storage media. Computer storage media include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, or program modules. The system memory 1504, the removable storage device 1509, and the non-removable storage device 1510 are all computer storage media examples (i.e., memory storage.) According to an aspect, computer storage media include RAM, ROM, electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other article of manufacture which can be used to store information and which can be accessed by the computing device 1500. According to an aspect, any such computer storage media is part of the computing device 1500. Computer storage media do not include a carrier wave or other propagated data signal.

According to an aspect, communication media are embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and include any information delivery media. According to an aspect, the term “modulated data signal” describes a signal that has one or more characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media.

FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate a mobile computing device 1600, for example, a mobile telephone, a smart phone, a large display device, a tablet personal computer, a laptop computer, and the like, with which aspects may be practiced. With reference to FIG. 16A, an example of a mobile computing device 1600 for implementing the aspects is illustrated. In a basic configuration, the mobile computing device 1600 is a handheld computer having both input elements and output elements. The mobile computing device 1600 typically includes a display 1605 and one or more input buttons 1610 that allow the user to enter information into the mobile computing device 1600. According to an aspect, the display 1605 of the mobile computing device 1600 functions as an input device (e.g., a touch screen display). If included, an optional side input element 1615 allows further user input. According to an aspect, the side input element 1615 is a rotary switch, a button, or any other type of manual input element. In alternative examples, mobile computing device 1600 incorporates more or fewer input elements. For example, the display 1605 may not be a touch screen in some examples. In alternative examples, the mobile computing device 1600 is a portable phone system, such as a cellular phone. According to an aspect, the mobile computing device 1600 includes an optional keypad 1635. According to an aspect, the optional keypad 1635 is a physical keypad. According to another aspect, the optional keypad 1635 is a “soft” keypad generated on the touch screen display. Other features of the mobile computing device 1600 may include pens, mouse, or other input device. In various aspects, the output elements include the display 1605 for showing a graphical user interface (GUI), a visual indicator 1620 (e.g., a light emitting diode), and/or an audio transducer 1625 (e.g., a speaker). In some examples, the mobile computing device 1600 incorporates a vibration transducer for providing the user with tactile feedback. In yet another example, the mobile computing device 1600 incorporates input and/or output ports, such as an audio input (e.g., a microphone jack), an audio output (e.g., a headphone jack), and a video output (e.g., a HDMI port) for sending signals to or receiving signals from an external device. In yet another example, the mobile computing device 1600 incorporates peripheral device port 1640, such as an audio input (e.g., a microphone jack), an audio output (e.g., a headphone jack), and a video output (e.g., a HDMI port) for sending signals to or receiving signals from an external device.

FIG. 16B is a block diagram illustrating the architecture of one example of a mobile computing device. That is, the mobile computing device 1600 incorporates a system (i.e., an architecture) 1602 to implement some examples. In one example, the system 1602 is implemented as a “smart phone” capable of running one or more applications (e.g., browser, e-mail, calendaring, contact managers, messaging clients, games, and media clients/players). In some examples, the system 1602 is integrated as a computing device, such as an integrated personal digital assistant (PDA) and wireless phone.

According to an aspect, one or more application programs 1650 are loaded into the memory 1662 and run on or in association with the operating system 1664. Examples of the application programs include phone dialer programs, e-mail programs, personal information management (PIM) programs, word processing programs, spreadsheet programs, Internet browser programs, messaging programs, and so forth. According to an aspect, unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is loaded into memory 1662. The system 1602 also includes a non-volatile storage area 1668 within the memory 1662. The non-volatile storage area 1668 is used to store persistent information that should not be lost if the system 1602 is powered down. The application programs 1650 may use and store information in the non-volatile storage area 1668, such as e-mail or other messages used by an e-mail application, and the like. A synchronization application (not shown) also resides on the system 1602 and is programmed to interact with a corresponding synchronization application resident on a host computer to keep the information stored in the non-volatile storage area 1668 synchronized with corresponding information stored at the host computer. As should be appreciated, other applications may be loaded into the memory 1662 and run on the mobile computing device 1600.

According to an aspect, the system 1602 has a power supply 1670, which is implemented as one or more batteries. According to an aspect, the power supply 1670 further includes an external power source, such as an AC adapter or a powered docking cradle that supplements or recharges the batteries.

According to an aspect, the system 1602 includes a radio 1672 that performs the function of transmitting and receiving radio frequency communications. The radio 1672 facilitates wireless connectivity between the system 1602 and the “outside world,” via a communications carrier or service provider. Transmissions to and from the radio 1672 are conducted under control of the operating system 1664. In other words, communications received by the radio 1672 may be disseminated to the application programs 1650 via the operating system 1664, and vice versa.

According to an aspect, the visual indicator 1620 is used to provide visual notifications and/or an audio interface 1674 is used for producing audible notifications via the audio transducer 1625. In the illustrated example, the visual indicator 1620 is a light emitting diode (LED) and the audio transducer 1625 is a speaker. These devices may be directly coupled to the power supply 1670 so that when activated, they remain on for a duration dictated by the notification mechanism even though the processor 1660 and other components might shut down for conserving battery power. The LED may be programmed to remain on indefinitely until the user takes action to indicate the powered-on status of the device. The audio interface 1674 is used to provide audible signals to and receive audible signals from the user. For example, in addition to being coupled to the audio transducer 1625, the audio interface 1674 may also be coupled to a microphone to receive audible input, such as to facilitate a telephone conversation. According to an aspect, the system 1602 further includes a video interface 1676 that enables an operation of one or more camera(s) 1630 to record still images, video stream, and the like.

According to an aspect, a mobile computing device 1600 implementing the system 1602 has additional features or functionality. For example, the mobile computing device 1600 includes additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in FIG. 16B by the non-volatile storage area 1668.

According to an aspect, data/information generated or captured by the mobile computing device 1600 and stored via the system 1602 are stored locally on the mobile computing device 1600, as described above. According to another aspect, the data are stored on any number of storage media that are accessible by the device via the radio 1672 or via a wired connection between the mobile computing device 1600 and a separate computing device associated with the mobile computing device 1600, for example, a server computer in a distributed computing network, such as the Internet. As should be appreciated such data/information are accessible via the mobile computing device 1600 via the radio 1672 or via a distributed computing network. Similarly, according to an aspect, such data/information are readily transferred between computing devices for storage and use according to well-known data/information transfer and storage means, including electronic mail and collaborative data/information sharing systems.

FIG. 17 illustrates one example of the architecture of a system for providing a unified system for bimanual interactions as described above. Content developed, interacted with, or edited in association with the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is enabled to be stored in different communication channels or other storage types. For example, various documents may be stored using a directory service 1722, a web portal 1724, a mailbox service 1726, an instant messaging store 1728, or a social networking site 1730. The unified system for bimanual interactions 130 is operative to use any of these types of systems or the like for providing a unified system for bimanual interactions, as described herein. According to an aspect, a server 1720 provides the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 to clients 1705 a,b,c. As one example, the server 1720 is a web server providing the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 over the web. The server 1720 provides the unified system for bimanual interactions 130 over the web to clients 1705 through a network 1740. By way of example, the client computing device is implemented and embodied in a personal computer 1705 a, a tablet computing device 1705 b or a mobile computing device 1705 c (e.g., a smart phone), or other computing device. Any of these examples of the client computing device are operable to obtain content from the store 1716.

Implementations, for example, are described above with reference to block diagrams and/or operational illustrations of methods, systems, and computer program products according to aspects. The functions/acts noted in the blocks may occur out of the order as shown in any flowchart. For example, two blocks shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.

The description and illustration of one or more examples provided in this application are not intended to limit or restrict the scope as claimed in any way. The aspects, examples, and details provided in this application are considered sufficient to convey possession and enable others to make and use the best mode. Implementations should not be construed as being limited to any aspect, example, or detail provided in this application. Regardless of whether shown and described in combination or separately, the various features (both structural and methodological) are intended to be selectively included or omitted to produce an example with a particular set of features. Having been provided with the description and illustration of the present application, one skilled in the art may envision variations, modifications, and alternate examples falling within the spirit of the broader aspects of the general inventive concept embodied in this application that do not depart from the broader scope. 

We claim:
 1. A method for providing a unified system for bimanual interactions on flexible representations of content, comprising: receiving an interaction on a display that defines a selection of a focus area on a display, wherein the focus area extends outward from the interaction and includes an object; displaying controls in the focus area for interacting with the object; receiving a selection of a given control indicating an interaction with the object; and updating the object based on the interaction indicated.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the controls are operable to shift between varying levels of structure associated with the object.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the region associated with the palm of the hand defines a fold control, and wherein the selection of the given control is received by dragging the object to the fold control.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the interaction indicated with the object removes the object from the application canvas and places the object onto a clipboard.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein an icon of the object is displayed in the region as a paste control, wherein a selection of the paste control inserts the object into the application canvas in the focus area.
 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the clipboard is a cloud-storage location associated with a user and is configured to provide objects placed thereon for use across multiple devices.
 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a selection of a parent control; and in response to receiving the selection of the parent control, displaying sub-controls of the parent control for interacting with the object, wherein the given control is one of the sub-controls.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the sub-controls are displayed in the focus area on an axis extending from the parent control.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the sub-controls are organized into functional categories, wherein each functional category is displayed along an associated axis extending from the parent control.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the selection of the object is received in response to defining the focus area and determining that the object is displayed within the focus area.
 11. A system for providing a unified system for bimanual interactions on flexible representations of content, comprising: a processing unit; and a memory including instructions, which when executed by the processing unit, causes the system to: receive a selection of an object, wherein the object is displayed within a focus area of an application canvas defined by a first vector extending along a first finger of a hand for a given distance, a second vector extending along a second finger of the hand for the given distance, and an arc between the first vector and the second vector; display controls in the focus area for interacting with the object; receive a selection of a given control indicating an interaction with the object; and update the object based on the interaction indicated.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the first vector and the second vector intersect in the application canvas at a region associated with a palm of the hand.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the region associated with the palm of the hand defines a fold control, and wherein the selection of the given control is received by dragging the object to the fold control.
 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the interaction indicated with the object copies the object from the application canvas and places the object onto a clipboard.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein an icon of the object is displayed in the region as a paste control, wherein a selection of the paste control inserts the object into the application canvas in the focus area.
 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the clipboard is a cloud-storage location associated with a user and is configured to provide objects placed thereon for use across multiple devices.
 17. The system of claim 11, further operative to: receive a selection of a parent control; and in response to receiving the selection of the parent control, display sub-controls of the parent control for interacting with the object, wherein the given control is one of the sub-controls.
 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the sub-controls are displayed in the focus area on an axis extending from the parent control.
 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the sub-controls are organized into functional categories, wherein each functional category is displayed along an associated axis extending from the parent control.
 20. A computer readable storage media including computer readable instructions, which when executed by a processing unit, performs steps for providing unified system for bimanual interactions on flexible representations of content, comprising: receiving a selection of an object, wherein the object is displayed within a focus area of an application canvas defined by a first vector extending along a first finger of a hand for a given distance, a second vector extending along a second finger of the hand for the given distance, and an arc between the first vector and the second vector; displaying controls in the focus area for interacting with the object; receiving a selection of a given control indicating an interaction with the object; and updating the object based on the interaction indicated. 